‘Stories by Rabindranath Tagore’ Reanimates the Complexity of 20th Century Bengal

[Photo Source: Wikipedia]

by Elizabeth Jaikaran

Rabindranath Tagore is one of the most prominent cultural icons of pre-partition Bengal and, arguably, India at large. He was a late nineteenth/early twentieth-century creative genius who penned scores of plays, short stories, novels and poems, as well as thousands of short songs, including the national songs for India (Jana Gana Mana) and Bangladesh (Aamaar Sonar Bangla). He was the first non-European to win a Nobel Prize in Literature and is one of the most celebrated proponents of the Bengal Renaissance. Tagore’s works have made their way into dozens of Bengali and Hindi film adaptations. Nothing, however, is quite as pure and honest as Anurag Basu’s “Stories by Rabindranath Tagore.”

Tagore
[Photo Source: Pinterest]
The series is in Hindi—a curious quality at first blush. Why wouldn’t Basu want to preserve the substance of Tagore’s literary corpus by executing a Bengali production? It turns out that in addition to wanting the series to be accessible to a wider viewership beyond Bengal, Basu was essentially thwarted from shooting in Bengal due to ongoing union and labor disputes in Calcutta. Nonetheless, the Hindi series aptly revives his writing in a way that silences the age-old adage among literary braggarts that “the book was so much better than the movie!

The series is divided into 26 episodes of some of his most famous stories, intermittently accented by his own musical compositions. Just a few episodes in, it becomes very clear why Tagore’s works have not been more widely adapted and produced beyond his beloved Bengal—the Indian Censor Board would surely never allow the controversial themes captured in his works to find new life on screen.

Tagore3
[Tagore performing in a play in 1881 | Photo Source: Wikipedia]
Tagore was a categorical renegade. Thus, most of his writing is set in a politically unstable Bengal and exhibits clear cynicism of the prevailing nationalist movements of his time. Make no qualms – Tagore doubtlessly craved independence from the British Empire and voiced his anti-colonial sentiment throughout his life. In fact, after being awarded knighthood in 1915 by King George V, he renounced it after the 1919 Jallianwala Bagh massacre. He tended to fundamentally disagree with many of his countrymen, however, with respect to how the right of independence should be achieved.

Specifically, he was highly critical of the Swadeshi movement that was prominent in Bengal in the early years leading up to independence—a movement that focused on national self-sufficiency, advocated for the boycott of all foreign goods, and became known for its violent protests. Tagore was horrified by the violent effects of Swadeshi demonstrations and rejected the economic resistance effort because of its ruinous consequences for Muslim traders throughout the country. Instead, Tagore’s brand of nationalism advocated for independence gained through education and reconciliation between the western and eastern worlds, rather than through blind revolutionary impulses and the rejection of all things British.

Notably, the feeling was mutual, as many of his countrymen (even today!) considered Tagore to be an anti-nationalist. Despite the popularity of his work, Tagore’s privileged upbringing among the Bengali elite, in addition to his contrary political stances, created friction among his readership. While prevailing nationalist movements centered their pride on remaining within India and rejecting foreign contact, throughout his life, Tagore traveled to over thirty countries, meeting dozens of dignitaries and intellectual icons in the process. Again, to refocus on the significance of his privilege, he simply was not an accessible writer for those who could not comprehend or connect with his lifestyle and largely counter-cultural convictions.

Tagore2
[Rabindranath Tagore and Albert Einstein in Berlin in 1930 | Photo Source: Pinterest]
 Far more captivating than his political views, however, the series of stories also captures his markedly progressive stance on gender and religious politics. He was undoubtedly anti-caste and voiced clear displeasure with regressive societal strictures on women through the complex and strong female characters in his works. Tagore used his female characters to explore themes of identity and singularity, as well as hot-button twentieth-century issues, like education for women and the isolation of widows. Basu breathes new life into all of the intricate innards of Tagore’s writing in the first season of “Stories by Rabindranath Tagore” while maintaining the excitement that ebbs naturally from scandalous topics like extra-marital affairs and financial betrayal—all without the excessive and glamorous dressings that South Asian shows now retain as a necessary staple.

In its simplicity resides a beauty that will bring you closer to the genius of Tagore and his romantic sensitivities, as well as to his staunch political sensibilities and apparent disillusion with the societal status quo. Each episode is a testament to the brilliance of a literary canon that is worthy of veneration next to Tolstoy and Frost, yet somehow stifled and underrepresented. His characters are honeycombs of flying emotions leading lives filled with captivating commotion. They will stay with you long after you have finished watching.


Elizabeth JaikaranElizabeth Jaikaran is a freelance writer based in New York. She graduated from The City College of New York with her B.A. in 2012, and from New York University School of Law in 2016. She is interested in theories of gender politics and enjoys exploring the intersection of international law and social consciousness. When she’s not writing, she enjoys celebrating all of life’s small joys with her friends and binge watching juicy serial dramas with her husband. Her first book, “Trauma” will be published by Shanti Arts in 2017.

 

 

Comments